|
|
You
Are
Here:
Home
>
Traffic
Case
Law
Traffic
Case Law 1 -
Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania v.
Gail Denny,
Appellant.
Appellant
Gail Denny was
convicted of
exceeding the
maximum speed
as proscribed
by 75 Pa.C.S.A.
§ 3362.
Her citation
indicated that
she had been
clocked by a
KR-10 radar
device as
travelling at
69 miles per
hour in a 55
mile per hour
speed zone.
Traffic
Case Law 2 -
State of
Georgia v.
Peter Van
Nort
In this traffic
case, Peter Van
Nort was
convicted of
speeding within
the state of
Georgia. He
appeals,
challenging the
admission into
evidence of the
results of a
laser speed
detection
device.
Traffic
Case Law 3 -
State
of Georgia v.
William
Odem
Defendant
William Odum
was convicted
of speeding 99
miles per hour
in a 55 mile
per hour zone
and reckless
driving. The
defendant is
contending that
the city court
erred in
admitting
evidence of his
speed for
noncompliance
i. e. the State
neither proved
that the
Federal
Communications
Commission
licensed the
City of Atlanta
Police
Department to
use the laser
speed detection
device used to
clock his speed
nor showed that
the Department
of Public
Safety ("DPS")
certified the
technician who
calibrated the
device before
it was placed
in active
service.
Other
Recommeneded
Directory
Links:
|
Alabama,
Alaska, Arizona,
Arkansas, California,
Colorado, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida,
Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kansas, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota,
Mississippi,Missouri,
Montana, Nebraska,
Nevada, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico,
New York, North
Carolina, North Dakota,
Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Carolina,
South Dakota, Tennessee,
Texas, , Utah, Vermont,
Virginia, Washington,
West Virginia,
Wisconsin, Wyoming.
|
PayNoFine's
how-to guide is your
traffic
ticket
to understanding how the
system works and to get
your traffic citation
dismissed.
More
details
>>>
|
|
